Home Articles FAQ Site Map
This article is my opinion, and not legal advice. I am a judgment broker, and am not a lawyer. If you ever need any legal advice or a strategy to use, please contact a lawyer.
Res Judicata helps to stop duplicate work in civil courts, and Double Jeopardy reduces duplicate criminal court proceedings. The basic concept for both civil and criminal courts is claim preclusion, meaning the same issues cannot be re-litigated; and people do not usually get punished twice for the same crime or misdeed, at least not in court.
Res Judicata helps prevent wastes of the court system's resources. Whether or not Res Judicata applies, is not always an easy decision for the judge. The scope of the previous judgment can be difficult to compare with the new issues being considered. Sometimes, just one claim is struck from a lawsuit complaint, so just one factual issue is removed from reconsideration for a new trial.
There are four requirements that must be true, before Res Judicata (preclusion) can apply to stop a new lawsuit from proceeding:
1) The same facts, claims, and causes of action, must be in both the old judgment and the new lawsuit.
2) The previous judgment must be final.
3) The parties must be the same in both the previous judgment and the new lawsuit.
4) The defendant in the first judgment had a fair chance to be heard on the issues. In some courts, especially bankruptcy courts, default judgments may sometimes be treated as if the defendant may have been cheated out of their chance to defend themselves; instead of the reality that they chose to ignore the previous lawsuit.
Res Judicata does not apply when a judgment gets appealed. This is because the appeal process addresses the issues in original judgments. The appeals process gives a second chance to the defendant, and allows them to bring up new facts; while the plaintiff is usually not allowed to bring up new facts (to get a second bite at the apple).
Collateral judgment attacks can bypass Res Judicata, because they can challenge the validity of a judgment; instead of the facts that led to the judgment. Collateral judgment attacks are often based on procedural or jurisdictional issues. Collateral attacks are rare, and when they happen, they usually involve multiple jurisdiction situations; for example, when domesticating state or federal judgments.
Note that many bankruptcy courts ignore res-judicata, and like to re-try default judgments for fraud. The attorneys make more money, the trustee can bill more, and the creditor gets less. Bankruptcy courts are unfair to creditors. In bankruptcy court, the doctrine is collateral estoppel (issue preclusion), not res judicata (claim preclusion).
Go Back To Articles JudgmentBuy.com Home Page
|JudgmentBuy - Contact Mark at Mark@GoGuys.com|
Mark D. Shapiro |
1346 The Alameda Suite 7-156 San Jose, CA 95126
© Copyright 2001-2014 Mark D. Shapiro. Entire site is protected by copyright laws. All rights reserved.